{"id":275,"date":"2001-10-23T12:00:06","date_gmt":"2001-10-23T11:00:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/?p=275"},"modified":"2015-04-28T23:45:40","modified_gmt":"2015-04-28T22:45:40","slug":"the-fallout-from-terrorism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/?p=275","title":{"rendered":"The fallout from terrorism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Since the attacks on September 11th, my mailbox has been full of e-mails speculating on what the Government might do or should do in the aftermath.\u00a0 Regardless of their merits it does seem to me at least that an awful lot of people are running around like chickens with their heads cut off.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Terrorism is nothing new in the UK of course, although nothing on the scale of the attack in New York City has ever happened here, the closest thing was a bomb at Canary Wharf.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">So what will happen?\u00a0 Well, of course my crystal ball is exceedingly murky because the Government in these situations does have a tendency to have a knee-jerk response and that response will be to whatever the terrorists do.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In the United States the picture is clearer, at least as regards guns.\u00a0 More gun control laws are distinctly out of fashion as guns fly off the shelves due to worry about terrorism.\u00a0 Of course, there is far more chance of being hit by a car crossing the road to get to the gun shop, then being a victim of one of Osama&#8217;s zealots, but providing there is no further crisis that causes a mass panic there will be two outcomes, I suspect.\u00a0 One is that there are a lot of first-time gun owners and many of them will find that shooting is something they enjoy.\u00a0 If nothing else, firearm instructors will be making some money in addition to the gun shops.\u00a0 The second outcome is that I suspect in a couple of years time there will be a lot of barely used guns on the market.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">One of the more intriguing things that has happened in the US is that the Airline Pilots Association has come out strongly in support of allowing pilots to be armed, and a measure allowing them to be armed after undergoing training seems certain to become law.\u00a0 This is not as simple an issue as some have made out.\u00a0 Using a firearm on board an aircraft is not something to be undertaken lightly.\u00a0 There have been those that have suggested it would be unsafe because of the possibility of explosive decompression.\u00a0 As it turns out, an airliner can take quite a large number of bullet holes through the fuselage without problems, assuming the bullets even penetrate it.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The problems are in fact somewhat less dramatic.\u00a0 Airliners are packed with passengers (well, not at the moment).\u00a0 Discharging a firearm on an aircraft means an excellent chance of hitting a bystander.\u00a0 Discharging a firearm also means a good chance of a mass panic.\u00a0 On an aircraft this is a serious problem because if the passengers all cluster in one area of the aircraft it can cause a load imbalance that can cause the aircraft to pitch.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Another problem is that hijackers are far more dangerous than a mugger or armed robber would be.\u00a0 In many cases they are well-trained, motivated and heavily armed.\u00a0 To take them on requires extremely well-trained personnel.\u00a0 For these reasons the FAA Air Marshall firearm training course is probably the most demanding of any police organisation anywhere on the planet.\u00a0 Pilots probably don&#8217;t need this level of training as they are merely defending the cockpit rather than actively engaging terrorists in the passenger cabin, but still, they will need excellent training with regular practice sessions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">However, the main problem with this proposal, which I have yet to see mentioned anywhere else, is that it suffers from the substantial loophole that it only applies in the United States.\u00a0 What happens if a US airline flies to France or some other European country for example?\u00a0 Will the pilot find himself arrested for illegal possession of a firearm as he steps off the plane?\u00a0 Even more alarming, what about flights by foreign airlines from the United States?\u00a0 A terrorist may well target a British Airways or Air France flight knowing that the air crew are almost certainly unarmed due to the existence of more restrictive legislation in those countries.\u00a0 Many foreign airlines have flights that take off from airports in the US.\u00a0 Unless these problems are addressed by reciprocal legislation in other countries, the US legislation is largely futile.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Whether or not the Government here will reciprocate is an intriguing question.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #000000;\">What about my guns?<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">One of the major concerns expressed by shooters is that a crackdown on terrorism will mean a crackdown on them.\u00a0 It&#8217;s impossible to say at the moment.\u00a0 Certainly firearms have not featured in the terrorist acts so far.\u00a0 Given how restrictive firearm laws are in Europe my personal feeling is that it is unlikely, although there may be changes in other laws that indirectly affect shooters, such as a law requiring everyone to carry photo ID, a firearm certificate would be an example of that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Certainly concern about more restrictive gun laws appears to be fueling a fire sale of stock among certain European wholesalers, prices have fallen to silly levels for certain guns in France and Germany.\u00a0 Unfortunately shooters in the British Isles won&#8217;t benefit from that as our wholesalers carry so little stock nowadays.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The new SA80<\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Ministry of Defence has announced that the modified SA80, the L85A2 individual weapon (rifle, to you and I) and L86A2 light support weapon have passed all tests &#8220;comfortably&#8221; and are in the process of adoption, some 10,000 having been converted already.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">I&#8217;ve made no secret of my opposition to this move in earlier editorials, and the cost appears to have gone up now too, from \u00a380 million to \u00a392.5 million.\u00a0 Clearly replacing many of the major parts of the gun with better designed bits from H&amp;K will improve things, but what is perhaps more worrying is the spin the MoD is putting on it in the press package.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">It describes the alterations as &#8220;minor&#8221;, no doubt in order to conceal just how truly horrendous the gun was prior to the changes.\u00a0 Other worrying comments are the weak attempt to explain away the difficulties left-handed shooters face using it, plus the excessive weight (which the MoD attempts to conceal by giving the weight figure minus the sights &#8211; a rifle with no sights isn&#8217;t much use).\u00a0 Perhaps the all-time classic comment is that reliability has improved just as a new Vauxhall Astra is better than one made in 1986 &#8211; missing entirely the point that a Kalashnikov made in 1951 beats an SA80 made in 1986 hands down!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Also the &#8220;special forces&#8221; cop out continues, the MoD simply cannot explain away why the special forces have adopted completely different weapons made by Diemaco, so instead they say that they cannot comment, when everyone knows from the contract award that the special forces are using different guns.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Of course, now there is talk of putting in ground forces in Afghanistan, things could get very messy very quickly.\u00a0 It is perhaps a good job that the units that will be first in aren&#8217;t armed with the SA80!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">According the MoD, the SA80 will remain in front-line service until at least 2020.<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><i><span style=\"font-family: Times New Roman;\">&#8220;I was armed to the teeth with a pitiful little Smith &amp; Wesson&#8217;s seven shooter, which carried a ball like a homeopathic pill, and it took the whole seven to make a dose for an adult.\u00a0 But I thought it was grand.\u00a0 It appeared to me to be a dangerous weapon.\u00a0 It had only one fault &#8211; you could not hit anything with it.\u00a0 One of our conductors practiced a while on a cow with it; as long as she stood still and behaved herself, she was safe; but as soon as she went to moving about, and he got to shooting at other things, she came to grief.&#8221; &#8211; Mark Twain, critiquing the S&amp;W No. 1 .22 revolver in the 1860s.<\/span><\/i><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Since the attacks on September 11th, my mailbox has been full of e-mails speculating on what the Government might do or should do in the aftermath.\u00a0 Regardless of their merits it does seem to me at least that an awful lot of people are running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Terrorism is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,14,9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-275","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-crime","category-editorial","category-military"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=275"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":414,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/275\/revisions\/414"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=275"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=275"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=275"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}