{"id":301,"date":"1999-01-01T12:00:12","date_gmt":"1999-01-01T12:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/?p=301"},"modified":"2015-04-29T23:39:49","modified_gmt":"2015-04-29T22:39:49","slug":"for-gods-sake-let-us-defend-ourselves","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/?p=301","title":{"rendered":"For God&#8217;s sake, let us defend ourselves!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Recently the US Dept. of Justice came out with <a href=\"http:\/\/bjs.gov\/content\/pub\/pdf\/cjusew96.pdf\"> a study comparing crime in England &amp; Wales with crime in the United States<\/a>, and to the surprise of the uninitiated the results were pretty alarming &#8211; violent crime in most categories occurs more frequently in England &amp; Wales than it does in the US.\u00a0 The only categories where the US outdoes E&amp;W is in homicide and rape &#8211; but the gap is closing and E&amp;W is not that far behind when it comes to rape.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The first thing that came to my mind was anger &#8211; Britons have been subjected in the last 15 years or so to laws which can only be described as the tactics of a police state. \u00a0 The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 was probably the watershed, followed by other galling laws such as the Criminal Justice Act 1988, and the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988.\u00a0 All of these laws had elements which attacked the civil liberties of the people in the hope that by restricting our freedoms crime would be prevented &#8211; wrong!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">So now we are living in an Orwellian police state, surrounded by CCTV, upon which I suppose we can be recorded when a mugger decides to rob us.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The problem with laws is that criminals are entirely unimpressed by them.\u00a0 I have yet to hear of a case in which waving a piece of paper in front of a criminal deterred him from committing a criminal act.\u00a0 Laws only work when backed up by the police and prison resources to enforce them, and it is that aspect which has been sadly lacking, especially the prisons part.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Certainly, crime can be reduced when police resources are focused upon it &#8211; the efforts of the Metropolitan police in 1994 led to a reduction in recorded armed robberies from nearly 6,000 in 1993 to only 4,104 a year later &#8211; but police resources can only go so far and can only focus in so many places at any one time.\u00a0 The crime statistics also show that at the same time as armed robbery is declining, offences of attempted murder and assault with firearms are going up.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">It is all particularly sad because the police are surrounded by all the resources that one could ever need for stopping crime &#8211; it&#8217;s called the public, but woe betide the copper who suggests allowing private individuals to take an active part in crime fighting. \u00a0 Why?\u00a0 Because it&#8217;s effectively illegal!\u00a0 Guns are illegal, stun guns are illegal, CS spray is illegal, hell, even <em>dogs<\/em> are illegal!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">What are we to make of the comments which emanate from time to time from the police and their masters, the Home Office?\u00a0 In 1993, I received a letter from Home Office minister Robin Ferrers in which he states: &#8220;&#8230;it is the responsibility of the police to protect the individual in society.&#8221;\u00a0 Indeed, so next time I get attacked I will take the police to court for failing to protect me, I cannot wait to see the look on the face of the judge!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The Northern Ireland Office of course has a completely different approach, because of the terrorists running about with Kalashnikovs.\u00a0 In Northern Ireland, there are about 9,500 firearm certificates on issue for handguns for personal protection.\u00a0 In addition, the MoD issues another 2,000 or so to it&#8217;s personnel for their protection.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">But can someone please tell me why someone who lives in Northern Ireland is allowed to own a gun for self-defence, but a person who lives in Great Britain is not?\u00a0 After all, I am sure there are plenty of scientists who have been fire-bombed by the Animal Liberation Front who would love to be able to have a gun!\u00a0 Salman Rushdie is even on record as saying he would like to have one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">But according to the Home Office <em>no-one<\/em> in Great Britain may have one. Although I am not 100% sure, it would appear that not everyone in high places agrees with the Home Office, because I hear stories repeatedly that the Home Secretary has given prohibited weapons authority to current and former members of the Met anti-terrorist squad to keep handguns for self-defence (via the Met Police Authority which he heads). \u00a0 Indeed, there is even a gunshop in London which caters to ambassadors and their staff who are able to hide behind diplomatic immunity if they get caught packing a gun in public.<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><big>Our supposed &#8220;gun lobby&#8221;<\/big><\/span><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">What is perhaps more galling than the comments of the bureaucratic nitwits in Whitewall is the limp-wristed approach our supposed &#8220;gun lobby&#8221; takes to the issue of self-defence.\u00a0 None of the national organisations is willing to go on record stating that people should be able to have guns for self-defence, even in limited circumstances. \u00a0 No organisation that I am aware of represents the 9,500 certificate holders in Northern Ireland in this regard either.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Instead we have talking heads who wax on about how a firearm may be designed to kill people, but it is really only used to shoot bits of paper nowadays.\u00a0 Rubbish. \u00a0 Guns are designed to kill, and until our supposed shooting lobby representatives take that bit of information fully on board instead of trying to talk around it, we will never make any progress towards getting the various gun bans in this country overturned in any meaningful way.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">What makes it all the more laughable is that the National Rifle Association is a registered charity because of it&#8217;s contribution to the &#8220;defence of the realm&#8221;, by teaching the military how to shoot more accurately, which by inference means how to destroy the enemy more effectively.\u00a0 Yet walking around the club houses on Bisley Camp introducing the concept of using a gun to shoot in self-defence into a conversation is likely to get you some peculiar looks.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Now, do we actually <em>need<\/em> guns for self-defence?\u00a0 Well, I personally don&#8217;t and you may not either, but take a drive into Hockley one of the days through Handsworth, and tell me that the jewellers who work there who are prayed upon by armed robbers don&#8217;t need them.\u00a0 Or ask someone who works at a security company in London transporting cash or valuables whether he doesn&#8217;t need one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Guns are without question the best deterrent to criminal attack, every criminological study on the subject points that out, so for God&#8217;s sake why won&#8217;t the Government allow us to use them?<\/span><\/p>\n<h5><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><big>The Keystone cops<\/big><\/span><\/h5>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">That of course is the $64,000 question, and one could write a book on the subject. \u00a0 The answer lies in Govt. distrust of the people, and also of the ingrained mood of the civil service, and probably also the myth that we will &#8220;turn into the United States&#8221; and other such claptrap which has built up due to the rubbish we see in the media nowadays.\u00a0 I wish we <em>would<\/em> turn into the United States, where fighting crime is taken seriously and violent crime levels are falling.\u00a0 One only hopes that criminological studies into European gun controls to be released this year will finally explode the myth that gun-related crime rates are lower because of our massively bureaucratic gun control laws.\u00a0 (Just for the record, armed robbery increased by 900% from 1969 to 1994 in E&amp;W and firearm-related homicide nearly tripled over the same period, while legal gun ownership fell by about a quarter).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">But perhaps the best example of the Government&#8217;s entrenched mind-numbing stupidity on this issue can be seen in the way that guns are used and kept by the police.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Most experienced shooters who have practised with armed police are astonished by their lack of skill.\u00a0 There are some who are good shots because they practice on their own time, but most are pretty mediocre.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">There are about 7,200 Approved Firearms Officers (AFOs) in GB.\u00a0 Training normally consists of two weeks on the handgun, and one week on the carbine (invariably the H&amp;K MP5SF).\u00a0 This is topped up by firing off a hundred rounds (often less) or so every quarter.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Now, how long did it take <em>you<\/em> to learn to shoot well?\u00a0 Now, I suppose it is possible that someone who knows how to shoot could stay reasonably safe and competent with 400 rounds of practice in a year, but 400 rounds a year after only three weeks of training?\u00a0 The only word to use is &#8220;Yikes!&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The police in Washington DC have a training regime not that dissimilar, and have recently been raked over the coals by the <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/\">Washington Post<\/a> <\/em>because of the staggering numbers of accidental shootings that have occurred.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Because of the nature of the armed police in this country (i.e. they are called to the scene after a report of an armed criminal and usually arrive too late to be of any use), shootings by the police are pretty rare.\u00a0 But when they do occur, there have been some major corkers.\u00a0 One of the first that was memorable was the shooting of a mental patient who was armed with a broken air pistol.\u00a0 He was stupid enough to point it at a police officer, who shot him, but the officer was behind cover and some distance away. \u00a0 The threat to the officer was slim and predictably the public outcry was loud. \u00a0 As a result, the police force in question spent a very large sum of money on a new training centre, and have had less gaffs since.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Up in Yorkshire if I recall correctly, a pensioner was shot dead by the police as he waved his walking stick at them from his bedroom window &#8211; the police mistook it for a rifle.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In London, armed police were called to the scene after two motorists saw a man through a window on the first floor of a pub with something in his hands &#8211; the police spread-eagled him at gunpoint on the road only to discover he had been fixing the toilet, and had a toilet handle in his hands.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In Kent, armed police surrounded the house of a pensioner who had scared some birds out of a tree in her backgarden with a cap pistol &#8211; unimpressed by the sudden appearance of MP5 toting police, she opened her front door and told them: &#8220;Go away.&#8221;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Near Brighton, an unarmed drug dealer was shot dead after being awoken by armed officers.\u00a0 The officer who did the shooting stated that he thought the man was going for a gun &#8211; nothing was found near the body.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In Manchester, another hapless individual found himself acquainted with the pavement outside his home after bursting a balloon in his home as a practical joke &#8211; the noise was reported as a gunshot, and along came the keystone cops with their MP5s.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">At Ascot, a member of the Met assigned to protect the Queen negligently discharged his pistol.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">The list is becoming endless, and in fact one gets the impression that some people are cottoning on to the idea that if you want to cause someone hassle, just phone up the cops and say they have a gun.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">We should perhaps be thankful that a 1994 report by HM Inspectorate of Constabulary found that a large proportion of guns owned by the police for operational use were so badly maintained as to be unusable!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">In this climate, can you imagine what would happen if people actually could own guns to defend themselves?\u00a0 Every time a shop keeper pulled his gun to defend himself, he would risk having a passer-by calling the police and being shot by them!<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">But frankly, the argument that the police are more capable of defending us than we are of defending ourselves is obviously hogwash.\u00a0 Empirical evidence has now clearly borne that out.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><small><small>&#8230;And finally<\/small><\/small><\/span><\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000;\">Personally, I think it&#8217;s time to go on the offensive and reclaim our rights.\u00a0 We have nothing to lose do we?\u00a0 Sharpen your pencils&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;\"><em>&#8220;God created the big people, and God created the little people, so Sam Colt invented the .45 to even things out.&#8221; &#8211; Trad.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #000000; font-family: Times New Roman;\"><em>&#8220;All the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence, suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.&#8221; &#8211; Bill of Rights, 1689<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recently the US Dept. of Justice came out with a study comparing crime in England &amp; Wales with crime in the United States, and to the surprise of the uninitiated the results were pretty alarming &#8211; violent crime in most categories occurs more frequently in England &amp; Wales than it does in the US.\u00a0 The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-crime","category-editorial"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=301"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":455,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/301\/revisions\/455"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.cybershooters.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}