Five years later…

It is with some shock that I realise that five years have passed since the creation of Cybershooters.

Cybershooters was started in the aftermath of the tragedy at Dunblane, in order to better distribute information among shooters, who were obviously going to be in for a pasting.

We were targeted with kneejerk legislation that went far beyond anything anyone could have imagined in March 1996, namely a near total ban on the private possession of handguns, with very few exceptions.  Virtually all target shooting sports with pistols, with the limited exception of those performed with air pistols and muzzle-loading pistols, were effectively banned a year later in 1997.

Looking back over those five years, it is painfully apparent what a complete and utter waste of time the handgun ban has been.  Lord Cullen, tasked with holding a public inquiry after the tragedy, did not even recommend a ban on handguns, but the issue became a political football with one-upmanship leading to a law that was far beyond anything that could have been justified in the name of public safety.  £100 million was spent on confiscating private property, yet precious little was done to implement Cullen’s other recommendations, especially the ones that didn’t have anything to do with guns.

It was done because “if it only saves one life”.  Yet now one of the organisations that said that, the Gun Control Network, says that the increase in handgun-related homicide since Dunblane is not “statistically significant“.  62 people were murdered with firearms from March 1999 to March 2000 according to the most recent statistics, 42 of them with handguns, apparently the highest figure on record.

What comfort is it to the families of those 42 victims, and the many dozens of other victims gunned down since Dunblane, to know that they were killed with illegally owned guns?  Not much.

The handgun ban was wrong.  It has achieved nothing other than to penalise law-abiding target shooters and waste huge sums of taxpayer’s money.  It has enhanced public safety not one jot.  That unfortunately appears to be one of the main legacies of the Dunblane massacre.  It is not a pretty picture.

What lessons have been learnt?

The only lesson the Government learnt from Dunblane apparently, is that you can appear to look tough on crime by cracking down on legitimate gun ownership.  Want proof?  Look no further than the Sunday Times from the 4th of March, in which Home Office minister Charles Clarke is quoted as saying:

“I am pleased to support the campaign of the Gun Control Network to abolish replica firearms. This is a scheme which has the support of much of the police service and others. There do remain some difficulties to deal with, but the government is sympathetic to this.”

The Gun Control Network point to a large increase in the sale of replica guns after the handgun ban.  The implication is that there is some insidious plot by former handgun owners to replace their handguns with replicas, which we sit at home stroking and drooling over, presumably.

In reality, low power firearms powered by carbon dioxide were removed from license controls by Section 48 of the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997 (after having been placed there by a bizarre court ruling in 1986), the same Act that banned handguns, the same Act strongly supported by the Labour Party – and obviously with the controls on them reduced, the sales of them have increased.  Simple really.  Too simple for the Gun Control Network apparently, who would rather perceive a paranoid insidious plot on the part of gun owners to promote the “gun culture” (whatever that actually is).

This is the same organisation that is afraid to let anyone join up in case they are “infiltrated” by gun owners.  Consequently they have a membership of six people.  They claim to represent the “silent majority” of the public, in reality opinion polls show a roughly 50/50 split on whether the handgun ban is a good idea, so one can safely infer that the public would be even less supportive of a ban of replica firearms.

The police (in the shape of ACPO, as per usual) apparently support further controls on replicas, even a ban, so we can assume a squad of coppers will shortly be arriving on the doorsteps of every home in the country to cut off everyone’s hands, in case you should succumb to the temptation to put your hand in your pocket and point your finger at the local shopkeeper and claim that you have a gun.

Truly the insane will shortly be running the asylum.  Let us hope that it is merely pre-election rhetoric.

Women and guns

One thing that always puzzles me is why there are so few women who take part in the shooting sports, at least in comparison to men.  I can understand to some degree why women may not be interested in sports where they are at a physical disadvantage, such as perhaps Practical Shotgun, which requires a lot of running around with heavy equipment, but Target Rifle?  Smallbore rifle?  Clay-pigeon shooting?

What really gets my goat about it is that in most shooting sports women actually have a physical advantage over men.  For so many years I have seen protests by women’s groups demanding equality, one assumes they do this with shooting by simply not taking part.  After all, wouldn’t want to show up the men, eh?

Throughout history, women have demonstrated that they are formidable shooters.  And in fact they are able to shoot better than men.  Annie Oakley is perhaps one of the better known examples, being able to shoot glass balls tossed in the air, using a lever-action rifle while standing on the back of a horse, running around an arena!

Women have an advantage over men because they are on average shorter than men, and their body fat is concentrated lower on their body than men.  This gives them a much lower centre of gravity and consequently they have a much more stable off-hand (standing) shooting position.  In addition, one clinical study I read some years ago indicated that on average women also have better eyesight than men.  Shorter arms also mean less leverage and once again a more stable position, provided the gun is properly fitted.

Joanna Hossack showed what women can do when properly armed in the Queen’s Prize last year at Bisley, winning the Grand Aggregate against all male (and female) competition.

I really wish women would look past the male stereotype of the shooting sports and get involved.  Okay, so it may put me at a disadvantage but it is worth it to witness some of the miraculous shots I have seen women make.


“My greatest desire is that every woman be able to handle a firearm as naturally as they handle a baby.” – Annie Oakley, 1893

Law and disorder

The new year begins with yet more evidence that the handgun ban was a futile waste of time, courtesy of Criminal Statistics for England & Wales.  The latest edition covers the period from March 1999 to March 2000.

To cut a long story short, there has been a sharp increase in firearm-related offences, especially with handguns.

There is however a lot of interesting stuff in these statistics. For example table 3.12 indicates that 142 handguns were stolen from residential premises 1999-2000. As very few handguns can be legally kept at home now and this figure is not dramatically lower than years when they were legal, it supports the argument shooters made that most stolen guns were illegally held to begin with.

Also, table 3.10 on locations of armed robberies.

Robberies at banks and building societies have fallen, no doubt because of target hardening, but offences on public highways and at shops have increased sharply.

The figures in 3.13 show that there are a lot of prosecutions for illegal handgun possession, you can see this because from 1997 (when handguns were banned) the offences under Section 1 fall sharply and under Section 5 they rise sharply.

Table 3.8 indicates that there were no fatal injuries caused with an airgun in the period 1999/2000, which doesn’t lend support to the calls for licensing them.

The figures in table 3.6 show that shotguns and handguns were about as equally dangerous when fired, which totally blows the Home Office position out of the water that they presented at the Dunblane Public Inquiry in 1996 that handguns are more dangerous than shotguns.

Table 3D shows clearly that the overwhelming majority of homicides committed with firearms are with illegally held firearms (but not broken down by type, unfortunately).

I’m sure there is more that can be extracted from this information.

For what it’s worth, my opinion is that the rate of firearm-related crime is rising because of the complete shambles the Government has made of the Metropolitan Police. Moving members of the flying squad out to “share their experience” has not worked and efforts aimed at stopping armed criminals appear to be dropping off.  Looking at the figures that accompany these statistics I was struck by the fact that the decline in firearm-related offences appears to bottom out in 1997 (when Labour came to power) and then rise sharply.

Essentially what shooters have been saying has now been proved beyond doubt, i.e. that the handgun ban was politically motivated drivel intended to encourage voters to vote for Labour, backed up with limp-wristed so-called “criminology”, which has now for all intents and purposes collapsed under the weight of the outrageous lie we knew it to be.

ACPO again

The taxpayer-funded police thinktank, the erroneously named: “Association of Chief Police Officers”, has submitted evidence to the Firearms Consultative Committee that .50 BMG calibre rifles and long-barrelled revolvers should be banned using an order under Section 1(4) of the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988.  This section allows the Secretary of State to make an order, subject to approval by Parliament, to ban firearms if they were not available in significant numbers prior to the Act and are “specially dangerous”.

Obviously handguns of any type are not specially dangerous as clearly shown by table 3.6 of the statistics referred to above, and how anyone could claim that a revolver fitted with an 18-inch barrel is any more deadly than an ordinary revolver is beyond me.  Long-barrelled revolvers have been around since the 1880s, so it seems unlikely an order under Section 1(4) could be legal.  ACPO are apparently in a mood because we found a way to carry on shooting handguns despite the ban.  That there are other ways to do that if long-barrelled revolvers are banned doesn’t seem to have occurred to them.

The use of .50 BMG rifles in armed crime in Great Britain is non-existent, and in Northern Ireland they have been used on rare occasions but only with armour-piercing ammunition that is prohibited in the UK under Section 5(1A) of the Firearms Act 1968.  That they are powerful firearms is beyond question, but “specially dangerous” with ordinary lead or mild steel core ammunition?  Not really.  In any event, there are only two ranges I know of in GB where they can be shot by civilians, which makes it next to impossible to show a “good reason” to own one.  This is a solution searching desperately for a problem.

Haven’t ACPO got anything better to do than harass responsible shooters?  They would be better named the Association to Create Petty Offences!

I strongly urge you to write to the FCC at the Home Office, 50 Queen Anne’s Gate, London, SW1H 9AT to protest this pointless attempt to destroy perfectly legitimate target shooting sports.

The SA80 saga continues, unfortunately

You really have to wonder about what goes on in Whitehall sometimes.

Not content with throwing away £100 million on the handgun ban, the Ministry of Defence wants to get in on the action by throwing away £80 million on a refurbishment effort for the L85A1 rifle and L86A1 Light Support Weapon that will entail sending 200,000 of them over to Heckler and Koch in Oberndorf, Germany, to be completely rebuilt.

So many parts will be replaced under this refurbishment programme that it is actually simpler to list the parts that won’t be replaced: the sights, the trigger mechanism housing (sans buttplate and pistol grip) and possibly the upper receiver shell, although that is open to question.  Everything else, barrel, bolt, gas system, furniture, even the magazines, will be replaced to give us the L85A2 and L86A2.

Now, I’m not going to sit here and suggest that the guns won’t be better afterwards, but you have to wonder at the logic of going to such great lengths to essentially replace 200,000 guns with 200,000 unproven guns, when there are plenty of other alternatives.  It would have been much easier to simply have bought the H&K G36 assault rifle off the shelf.  In talking with the MoD it became apparent to me that they don’t even know what the G36 is, despite City of London Police being armed with them!

That the SA80 is despised by the troops is patently obvious, going merely by the response to my review of it on this website.  Whether an expenditure of £80 million will restore confidence in it is doubtful.

It is utterly apparent that my views are shared, albeit privately, by pretty much anyone else in the MoD likely to ever have to shoot a gun in anger.  Want proof?  The MoD has recently acquired some £2.2 million plus worth of Diemaco C8 SFW carbines and C7A1s for special forces troops, this is in addition to the C7 rifles already used by grenadiers with M203s.

Now, if we’re going to arm the units of the armed forces most likely to see action with a completely different small arm, why not arm all of them with it, especially seeing as a Diemaco rifle is actually less expensive than the refit will cost?

You might care to make this point in a letter to your MP.  He or she will probably be fobbed off with some stupid letter from the MoD saying that information on special forces is classified, this is an absolute cop out and you should let your MP know that.  This is one time when shooters can stop a complete waste of taxpayer money and we should do it, now.

New guidance on antiques

Those nice people at the Home Office have come up with new guidance on antique firearms held under the provisions of Section 58(2) of the Firearms Act 1968, if you have Adobe Acrobat Reader you can click here to read it.

The march in March

Time to don your best slogans and march through London, yes it’s time for the next Countryside Alliance march.  I know some of you might not like fox hunting much but believe me, what’s left of shooting is next up for the chop if we sit here and do nothing.  Plus it is a way to let the Government know that handgun shooters will not be forgotten after we were scapegoated in 1997.  More information is available on the Countryside Alliance website.

Oh yes, and have a Happy New Year!

The Government’s Opinion

Well, we’ve been waiting since April for it, and finally the Government has responded to the Home Affairs Committee report with a Command Paper, Cm 4864.  The Government is required to respond to committee reports in the form of one of these papers.

To cut a long story short, the Government has rejected the Committee’s recommendation of licensing for airguns, and a ban on young people possessing firearms, but they have accepted most of the other recommendations.

Licensing for airguns or a ban on youngsters using guns would have been a red flag to the countryside lobby, who are already sounding off loudly about the proposed ban on fox hunting with dogs, and despite what deputy PM John Prescott has to say about it there is no doubt the Government is keen to avoid a repeat of the Countryside Alliance march on London.

The Government have however accepted the idea of an age limit of sixteen on unsupervised use of firearms, and that would be further limited by the requirement that supervised use by young people must be on private land.  The main objection here is that some shooting does take place on public land, but worse than this is the reality that a farmer could not legally give an air rifle to his fourteen-year old son to perform pest control with, unless he was supervised.  This is hopefully a flaw that can be fixed with some lobbying.

Wait for it…

But all is not roses or technical arguments.  The command paper does include a number of worrying proposals, most of them relating to shotguns and also registration.

The Government wants:

(a) to require referees for shotgun certificate applications, as  is currently the case with firearm certificates;

(b) to require that an applicant for a shotgun certificate have a “good reason” for needing shotguns (but apparently not for each individual gun, as is the case with firearm certificates);

(c) to require applicants to state on the application form the maximum number of shotguns they intend to acquire, and to have to apply for a variation if they want more than that;

(d) to standardise the fitness criteria and revocation criteria with firearm certificates.

Of these proposals my view is that (c) is the worst, because if it were rigidly applied shotgun certificate controls would only be marginally less restrictive than firearm certificate controls.  If all four proposals are adopted, in a very short period of time it is likely full Section 1 controls will be placed on shotguns, in my opinion.

Registration

The Government also thinks that centrally registering all guns held on certificate is a good idea.  Given that they still haven’t gotten the database of certificate holders working one wonders where on Earth they came up with this suggestion.  The Government doesn’t expect the current database to become available until the end of 2001, i.e. four years after the law requiring it was enacted.

My view here is to let the police and the Home Office dig their own grave.  It doesn’t make much difference to certificate holders as all our details and gun details are held by each local police force anyway, if the Government think holding them centrally can be done, let them try and fail like the Canadians!

Holding all the details centrally, available to the police, will likely open the licensing system up to attack under data protection and human rights laws as well, because by definition certificate holders have not been convicted of any serious offence, so our civil rights are fully intact.

Having a central register of everyone who owns a firearm, open to the police on demand and maintained by them without any sort of warrant or judicial oversight is certainly illegal under even the most casual interpretation of human rights legislation.

Yet more:

The Government also wants a tighter standard for deactivated firearms, which is something that has been on the cards for some time now.

The Government also wants to stop a “gun culture” from developing, whatever that means.

However, the most ridiculous comment is contained in the Government press release.  The Government apparently wants to “…work to tackle the use of illegal guns in crime…”, because as the Home Office minister, Charles Clarke assures us: “Our firearms controls are already among the strongest in the world, and these new proposals will increase their effectiveness.”

Well, if our controls are so strong, why do we need them to be stronger?  If our controls are so strong, why is illegal gun use a problem?

Answers to your local MP and the Home Office!

When any of this will be enacted into law is an open question.


“Because controls are good.” – A Home Office civil servant, when asked by author Jan Stevenson in 1987 why the Bill that became the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988 was needed.

The Tir Fédéral 2000

The period from the 23rd of June to the 16th of July this year saw the holding of the Tir Fédéral in Bière, Switzerland.

This is quite simply the largest shooting competition in the world by a big margin, and is held once every five years.

The idea of the match is to promote marksmanship among the Swiss, whose Army is made up almost completely of part-time militia, however many foreigners attended, including myself!

The courses of fire are based on ISSF rules, the only departure being that some courses of fire are shot with Swiss Ordnance weapons which do not meet ISSF rules, namely the SIG Stgw 57 and the newer SIG Stgw 90.  There were ISSF pistol events and 300m rifle.

The rifle events were divided into four classes, Free rifle (i.e. the rifles most commonly used in ISSF 300m), Stgw 57, Stgw 90 and a class for the various Schmidt-Rubin straight-pull rifles which pre-date the sturmgewehrs.  By far the biggest entry was in the Stgw 90 class, and this class also had the most prizes available.

The event attracted a staggering 60,000 competitors!  It is difficult to describe the physical size of such an event.  There were hundreds of firing points, divided across six separate ranges, all next to each other.  You can get some idea from the official website.  The courses of fire for the most part were fairly short and simple, something necessary no doubt due to the huge number of competitors taking part.  Scoring above a particular score earned a “distinction”, and the shooter qualified for a medal.

Shooting my own Stgw 90, I managed to qualify for one distinction out of the several courses of fire that I shot, not bad considering no practice!  Frankly it was difficult to know which target to shoot, there were so many of them in front of the firing point.

The organisation of this event deserves mention.  It was phenomenally well organised, by far the best organisation I have ever seen:

To begin with you went to the sign-up desk and picked the courses of fire you wanted to shoot.  Then after paying for them and receiving your Livret de Tir, you took your rifle to weapons control, who inspected it to make sure it complied with the rules.

Then you went to the Stand de Tir that had been assigned for you to shoot at, and presented your Livret de Tir to the scorer.  In this case a ten-year old girl, the system was so simple.  The scorer asked which course of fire you wished to shoot first, pressed a barcode reader against the relevant code and it appeared on a screen next to your firing point.  Then you shoot!  The whole thing was scored automatically.  After signing and accepting your score a score label was printed off and stuck in your Livret de Tir.  If you had shot well enough, you then took your book to the medal desk who pressed their barcode reader against your book to see what you had won and handed you your medal.

Truly incredible!

This picture shows shooters on the line.

A view inside one of the Stand de Tir.  Note the rifle racks along the back of the tent.

In this shot you can clearly see the monitors by the side of the firing point that display the current score (supplied by Sius Ascor).  Note also the targets in the distance.

The display of Cantonal flags outside the exhibition hall.

Hämmerli had a stand inside the main exhibition hall.  This is a display of AR50 air rifles.

Not a very good picture of a SIG P210 commemorating the Cantons of Switzerland.  An amazing work of art.

A picture of part of the prize table!  The amount of prizes was amazing, including new VW Beetles!

Another shot from the Hämmerli stand.  Of interest here is the second rifle down, a SIG-Sauer 205 ISSF rifle with aluminium stock.  The SG550 below it is finished with a limited edition black finish.

Now you can have a SG550 in blue!

Your editor’s medal!

If you want to download the video, click here.  You’ll need a player which can play AVI files, such as Windows Media Player.

 

…well, it wasn’t all bad.

For several months now shooters have been holding their breath awaiting the report of the Home Affairs Committee.

The Committee, at the behest of former Chairman Chris Mullin, announced a review of firearms control in England and Wales last summer.  This apparently sent alarm bells ringing at Queen Anne’s Gate, as Chris Mullin had written a Labour response in 1996 to the last review, making various bizarre demands, among them a ban on the possession of firearms in urban areas.  As the Labour Govt. had just announced that they would never ban shooting (don’t laugh), it was likely a report by Mullin would be seriously embarrassing.

Chris Mullin found himself promptly fired, er, I mean, “promoted” to a Government job upon the announcement, and Robin Corbett MP found himself Chairman of the committee.

You can read the report by clicking here.

It’s not all bad, but there are some serious clangers in it.  The one that made me laugh the hardest is in paragraph 35 of the report, Zimring’s comparison of homicide rates in London vs. New York City.  The committee appears blissfully unaware that in the period Zimring looked at there were actually more legally possessed handguns in London than New York!

The committee makes some 44 recommendations, the overwhelming majority of which are perfectly sensible and non-controversial.  However, there is plenty for shooters to be worried by:

The committee recommends that all airguns capable of causing lethal injury be licensed, which to put it mildly is a disaster in the making.  This is a fundamentally flawed recommendation for too many reasons for me to go into detail here.  The committee makes no attempt to do a cost/benefit analysis, and it is hard to see how the nine figure sum needed to license the several million airguns in circulation (assuming people complied) can be justified given the scale of airgun misuse (about 125 serious woundings and one death a year on average).

It is also hard to follow their logic on airguns.  Clearly most of the pressure for airgun licensing is coming from the police, but the police are worried more by airsoft guns and replicas it appears from the evidence they gave.  As non-lethal items, they would remain unlicensed and thus the committee’s proposal would achieve nothing in that regard.

There are two other worrying proposals.  The first is that there should be an absolute minimum age at which a person can use a firearm, even under supervision.  This would mean for example that it would be illegal for a parent to teach their child how to use an airgun in the back garden.  That is clearly unwarranted and addresses no specific public safety issue.

The committee strongly rejects Mullin’s nutty idea of banning guns from urban areas, but they do make considerable recommendations for tightening shotgun licensing that should be of concern to any shotgun owner.  Some of the recommendations are acceptable, such as requiring the same standard of “fitness” as for a firearm certificate and requiring referees instead of the countersignatory requirement.  However, there are also some bad proposals, such as in paragraph 93 – requiring an applicant to state how many shotguns he wants to own, and having to vary the certificate if he wants more.  My own view is that this issue is already covered by the requirement to keep guns securely.  Surely if the guns are kept securely it doesn’t matter how many the certificate holder owns, as a certificate holder can cause as much mischief with one shotgun as with a hundred.

Shooters will need to watch developments as a result of this report closely, and you should be making representations to your MP.

Security

New guidance on secure storage has been published, and it is comprehensive to put it mildly.  You can read it by clicking here. 

Lies, damned lies and hey, you know the rest.

Rarely has history seen a company commit suicide in such a public way as Smith & Wesson appears to be doing.

First, a quick bit of history – S&W is the largest (or was) handgun manufacturer in the US, holding about 20% of the market.  Various lawyers came up with an idea to sue gun companies and hold them liable for gun-related deaths and injuries around the US, basically turning tort law on its head.  The idea is that if you whack your thumb with a hammer while nailing up a picture, you can hold the company who made the hammer liable for the injury to your thumb.  There’s a bit more to it than that (some are suing on the basis of “negligent” marketing practices), but that’s the long and short of it.

The lawyers, and the cities who they have managed to get to sign on to this claptrap, figure that they don’t actually have to get gun companies to be held liable, the costs of defending all the suits will force them to settle.  Unfortunately the lawyers will be in for a rude surprise as the gun companies do not have any money with which to settle (unlike the tobacco companies, the last victims of this nonsense), so most gun companies have decided it’s better to risk going bankrupt than give in to extortion.

But not S&W – they have signed an agreement with the largest entity suing, the US Housing and Urban Development Dept., and most cities suing have agreed to drop their suits as well.  Sounds great, until you read the agreement – all wholesalers and dealers who sell S&W products will have to agree to a wide variety of things, such as no longer selling large capacity magazines, requiring specific safety training for customers, limiting the number of sales to customers and so on.  The net effect is that no wholesaler or dealer is going to be crazy enough to sign up to this nonsense, because to do so will put them out of business very rapidly.

The level of revulsion among gun dealers in the US has got three states fired up enough to target wholesalers and other manufacturers on anti-trust grounds – which surely is the height of hypocrisy as it is the cities themselves who are colluding to restrain business.

In desperation to save their silly agreement, about 60 cities and counties have agreed to give S&W “preferential” treatment in contracts for police guns.  This is illegal, unless the cities can establish that S&W sells something that they need that no-one else sells, because bidding has to be open and competitive.

And S&W knows that, because in the most supreme irony of all, it was S&W who sued the US Government in the mid-80s alleging bias in the military bidding for a new service pistol.  S&W’s suit established various principles on tendering for Government contracts.

Turnabout is fair play, it appears!

My personal (highly cynical) view is that S&W is simply trying to save some money on lawyer’s bills, because their current business contracts run until the end of this year – by which time Bill Clinton will have 20 days left in office and S&W can safely tear up this agreement.

Handgun ban a failure

Recently there has been a flurry of critical press stories concerning long-barrelled revolvers in GB (which are legal due to their length).  The most idiotic of all was the story that appeared in the Times, which in the same breath as condemning the import of a few hundred Ruger Super Redhawks with 18-inch barrels pointed to a police source that estimated that 10,000 handguns had been illegally imported since the ban.  A thousand or so long-barrelled revolvers in the hands of licensed target shooters hardly seems a great worry by comparison!

A most interesting question asked in Parliament elicited some useful information that for the first time breaks down firearm-related homcides by whether the firearm was legally owned or not.  Unfortunately they only cover the period up to the end of 1998.

Although there is a slight trend downward in firearm-related offences across the board (excluding airguns), what is fascinating is that handgun-related offences dwarf offences in which a shotgun was used, despite the fact that handguns are banned whereas shotguns are legal.

Colin Greenwood, well-known for his research into armed crime, postulates that armed robbery is the real measure of armed crime.  However this is one area in which I disagree, because with homicide and serious assaults, you can be fairly sure that the firearm used is real.  With armed robberies it might just be a sawn-off cucumber in a coat pocket.  However, the injury statistics on their own show quite clearly that the use of a handgun to cause injury is far higher than with a shotgun.

The injury figures presented in the above stats (follow the link) do include blunt trauma (i.e. pistol whippings), but it’s fair to say a higher proportion of them involve real firearms than armed robberies.

Clearly, despite the prohibition of handguns, they remain the gun of choice of serious criminals.

A further interesting set of statistics is presented here, these indicate that there are currently 163,000 firearm certificates and 690,000 shotgun certificates on issue in Great Britain – a dismal total, when compared to the numbers from ten years ago.  (In 1989, there were 183,000 firearm certificates and 952,000 shotgun certificates on issue in GB).

And on the subject of statistics…

A war of words has erupted between two countries at opposite ends of the Earth, or rather between the NRA of America and the Australian Government.

At issue are some statistics presented in an NRA video about gun bans around the world not being as effective as some would like to believe (you can watch the video at NRA Live).

The Australians say the statistics in the video are false, which is rather amusing seeing as they were sourced from the Australian Government website.  What we have here is a classic case of political novices going up against perhaps the most formidable political lobby on the face of the planet.  By opening their mouths, the Australian Government have given the NRA huge amounts of free publicity and invited the NRA and Australian pro-gunners to ram the Australian Attorney General’s foot down his throat.  I’ll wager he won’t try that again.

Don’t you wish we had a gun lobby this effective?

Trigger locks?  Ha!

There is currently a legislative effort in the US to require all handguns to be sold with trigger locks.

Anyone who holds a firearm or shotgun certificate will know how restrictive our storage requirements are by comparison.  BASC among others have helped draw up new guidance for the police, and you can see it by clicking here.  “Comprehensive” is an understatement.

The notes accompanying this guidance make it clear to the police that they should be sensible and keep their more silly opinions to themselves.  About time too.

So my next project will be to build myself a gun room…

And remember, the reason why anti-gunners use such short sound bites to attack gun owners is so that anti-gunners can understand them. 

IWA 2000

I decided to go to IWA this year, as my impression (which I believe is correct) is that IWA in Nuernberg offers more that is of interest to shooters in the British Isles.

This time I have made the pictures separate, click on the link to see pictures – some of the links go to company websites:

First is Aimpoint, who stole the show with their LaserShot setup, this is an interactive system made by LaserShot, but an excellent demonstration for Aimpoint’s products.  Eric Gauffel, IPSC World Champion was on hand, showing us all up!  My efforts on the IPSC Challenge course of fire elicited the comment: “Hey, he’s not bad!” from Eric, which is without doubt the best complement I have ever gotten!

Airmunition were there, with their innovative air cartridge system.  This is detailed at length in the SHOT show 1999 report.  Currently it is for sale to law enforcement only, due to the staggering price – a Glock 17T costs about £450, the air cartridges cost £18 each (eek!) and you also have to fork out for the reloading press and the pellets themselves.  It’s as close as you can come to a centrefire semi-auto pistol and be legal in Great Britain, but you won’t have much change out of two grand.

The Russians were there in the form of Baikal and Izhmash, several guns caught my eye, the first was the 12 gauge version of the Kalashnikov, which theoretically is legal in the UK although I think you will be hard pressed to come up with a “good reason”, but more power to you if you want to try.  There is also a .410 version, which could be used on indoor ranges with slug.  I’ve seen Cotswold Arms advertising both of these guns.  Also on display was the 9mm pistol that may become the new Russian service pistol.  Although it looks a bit crude, in the hand it actually felt surprisingly good, and the safety was well-located and easily operated.  It’s also a very solid piece of ordnance.  As Mikhail Kalashnikov likes to say: “ ‘The Best’ is the worst enemy of ‘Just Good Enough’ “.  I also took a picture of a double-stack Makarov, because in the hand I couldn’t tell any real difference between it and the CO2 version that is becoming popular.

Beamhit were in attendance, I covered this in the 1999 Shot show report, it is a very neat gadget which I mention again only because I am told they will shortly have a UK distributor.  It is a very clever widget that makes dry firing practice much more effective.

Beretta were showing off their new pistol, the plastic framed 9000S.  This still uses an open top slide, but has an innovative new locking system that is similar to the Browning delayed lockup but without the top locking.  Reviews I have read do not indicate stellar accuracy, however.  I personally found the trigger reach to be too short and narrow, making it difficult to cycle the hammer in DA mode.  Also the hammer is narrow and quite difficult to thumb back.  On the bright side, the magazines are similar to those of the 92FS, similar enough that you can use 92FS mags in the gun.  Capacity is 12+1 in 9mm, 10+1 in .40.  The gun uses a traditional safety mechanism, as found on the CZ-75 and Government Model.  Also worth mentioning are the natty holsters, available in a variety of different colours.

Another new gun is the Cougar 8000L, basically a slab-sided compact version of the Cougar, which I found to be superior to the original model.  One of my complaints about this pistol is the bulky slide, but Beretta seem to have solved that problem.  Also my concerns about the magazine release have been addressed, it is now the same as on the 92FS, without the exposed spring.  Capacity is 13+1 in 9mm, the invariable 10+1 in .40.

Beretta also has a .22 conversion kit available for the 92FS.  There are several new models of the 92FS, the most interesting to me was the 92FS Inox Brigadier, essentially the Brigadier model in stainless steel.  They also had the 98FS models, engraved and with silver or gold plating, if you want!  And if that isn’t enough for you to pose with, there is also a line of Beretta clothing.

Blaser now has their own range of hunting ammunition, UK importers are Beechwood if you want some.  It seemed well made but the proof is in the shooting, obviously.  On the stand they had the intriguing Blaser 99, essentially a side-by-side with an overtop rifle barrel.  Blasers are lovely rifles, but if you have to ask how much, you can’t afford one.  Of interest to target shooters was the R93 Long Range Sporter 2, which goes for around £1,500.  Available in 6mm Norma BR, 6.5×55, 7.62 NATO and .300 Win. Mag., I expect I will be seeing these at the range shortly!

Briley were there, makers of extremely accurate rifles, pistols and superlative shotgun chokes.  Their brochure was by far the best I picked up in terms of design, suffice to say their products are along the same line.

Browning had one of the larger stands, of definite interest to shooters in Britain (but not on the stand, unfortunately) are their new range of Buck Mark rifles, essentially the Buck Mark pistol fitted with a 16-inch heavy barrel and a shoulder stock.  I expect these will sell very well here.

Another new product is the BDA compact, a compact version of the “new” BDA, that is not new at all but is in fact somewhere around 20 years old.

Also I got to fondle one of the FN Five-seveN pistols, this is chambered for the toy-like 5.7x28mm round, designed to penetrate body armour.  An interesting design, although the ballistics don’t impress me much.  It may go through body armour but it doesn’t appear to do much after that.

CCI-Speer had some of their large range of products on display.  I think very highly of CCI ammo, it’s the best factory ammo going, IMO.  CCI also own Federal, and there appears to be some cross-development now going on, as Federal is making practice ammo with the CCI cleanfire primers.  CCI has a new improved hollowpoint .22 Mag loading.  What intrigued me the most was the Blazer .357 SIG load, which is the first Blazer load I have seen using bottle-necked cartridges.  I will have to try some of this out.  The main snag with Federal and CCI ammo is that in the UK it usually costs over the odds, though Edgar Bros. sell their .22 lines at reasonable prices.  Federal now has an inexpensive 62gr load in .223, another one for my “must try” list.

Another stand that caught my eye was Cybergun, a distributor of airsoft guns.  The Beretta copies are very hard to tell apart from the real thing, they’re made by Western Arms Co. of Japan.  Also the FA MAS replica by KWC is pretty good too.  Their UK agent is Shooting Planet in Brighton.

Colt’s were noticeable by their absence, their stand was empty.  However, they have entered into an agreement with CZ, apparently.  On the CZ stand was the Z40 pistol, essentially a DAO .40 CZ-75 shaped to look like a 1911.  It’s actually not as awful as it sounds, it felt quite good in the hand and the trigger pull was smooth.  It would not be a bad option as a cop gun, but I doubt they will sell many, and it really does show how desperate Colt’s are.

Feinwerkbau were displaying their new air pistol, the C55P.  This is essentially their CO2 gun redesigned to use compressed air.  A very interesting repeating air pistol, competition for the well-known Steyr LP5.

Fiocchi were there too, although there wasn’t anything earth-shatteringly new.

FNM, a division of INDEP, the Portugese military suppliers were there with their intriguing line of rifle ammunition in some of the more oddball calibres such as 7.5×54 MAS and 7.5×55 Swiss.  I asked them why they made ammo in these calibres, and the answer was intriguing: apparently most of their sales are to Germany and other countries which hold 100m competitions using as-issued military rifles that were in service prior to 1964.  I hadn’t heard of this competition before but apparently it is very popular and MAS and K31s are among the guns used.  I think this is something we should be doing in the British Isles as it offers real opportunity for international competition plus it is something which can be done at the club level here also.  York Guns import FNM ammo.

Geco had a fascinating new product, a shotgun slug developed specifically for practical shotgun competition.  Finally, my prayers are answered!  Importers are Dynamit Nobel UK Ltd.  Geco are also sponsoring the “Geco Slug Cup”, looks like fun!

I was fascinated with the Gehmann stand, they are makers of add-on widgets for ISSF rifles and pistols and also clothing for ISSF events.  I’ve heard good things about their gloves, they’re used by many top shooters, not just in ISSF.

And where would we be without Glock?  Robert Glock was on hand, shame they’re banned in GB, although you can still own the cutaway guns and some of the training guns.  They had a new holster which didn’t really impress me much, what was fascinating was the test Glock 17 in the display cabinet, which Hirtenberger had fired over 348,000 rounds through!  Impressive, especially considering this was in the AC prefix range, well before the later improvements to the barrel and the finishing of the gun.

Next are Hämmerli, who appear to be taking the same approach as Anschütz, in having a clothing line.  The Swiss effort is less impressive, and called X-Esse.  It seemed to me to be an attempt to make shooting hip and appealing to younger people.  I suppose it might work in Switzerland.  In addition, they are offering a range of coloured plastic grips in the “X-Esse” range.

Of more interest, Hämmerli were offering two new airguns, the AP40 pistol and the AR50 rifle.  The AP40 appears to be a development of the old 480, and the AR50 a competitor for Walther.  The .22s marketed in the US as the “Trailside” are being marketed in Europe under the “X-Esse” label.  They are set up more with target shooting in mind and I suspect will be very popular given their reasonable price.  X-Esse have their own website.

And now we move to Heckler & Koch, that famous British firm, lol.  H&K have a new semi-auto hunting rifle called the SLB2000.  It’s very dull, though I’m sure it works well.  There were several new permutations of the USP, I think it was called the USP Super Elite or something like that.  I’m sorry, but I can’t stand the grip of the full-size USP so I didn’t really pay attention.  There was a 50th anniversary model of the USP compact, wow.

Of vastly more interest to all concerned was the SL8 rifle.  I want one!  This is essentially a sporterised version of the new Germany Army rifle, the G36.  The European version is more interesting that the US one, as it will accept the G36 mags.  All the reviews I have read have been favourable to the gun.

What I found most fascinating about the gun (and why it is better than the competition) was the gas system.  The gas plug is a true innovation, with the gas rings around it, preventing gas from ingressing into the action as with most competing designs.  There is no gas tube or gas piston tube as such, just a slender rod that extends back to the bolt (at the top of the picture, not the bit in the middle).  Thankfully I can show you this as they had a cutaway on the stand!

It would be very easy for H&K to make a straight-pull version (for places where semi-autos are banned, like here) as you can tell from the pictures, but don’t hold your breath.

And now a real British company, HPS Ltd, makers of HPS target rifles and ammunition.  Their rifles are very impressive, and so is their ammo as I can attest to from personal experience.  Very accurate stuff, as good as Federal Gold Medal and a lot cheaper.  And it uses RO powder!  I was staggered by that.

Israel Military Industries were also exhibiting.  IMI are makers of Samson ammo, and will be known to most British shooters although they appear to have stopped selling to the civil market in the UK for reasons I’m not too clear on.  This is a shame as IMI must be one of the largest suppliers of ammunition and guns in Europe and I for one miss their presence here.

On the stand was their bolt-action .44 Magnum carbine, this was nothing spectacular, basically a surplus Mauser 98K action rebarrelled and adapted to use the Desert Eagle magazine.  However, it would appeal to target shooters in the UK and I have no idea why they aren’t trying to sell them here.

I also had a chat with Kempf Waffentechnik, who make a sporterised version of the SIG SG550 rifle for the German market, essentially the same gun with a thumbhole stock and the flash hider and other “military” features deleted.  I mention them because they told me to special order they could make the guns as straight-pulls, basically the same gun without a gas port in the barrel.  I’m very fond of the SG550 and I may have to buy one, though they are pretty expensive at around £1,900 each.

Lapua were there, they make loads of neat types of ammunition.  I only wish someone in the UK could stock them all, check out their website.

Lothar Walther had an uninspiring stand, however, pretty is as pretty does, and they make barrels for so many gun makers around the world it’s hard to keep track.  Good kit.

CBC, better known as Magtech had a stand, they are well-known as a maker of pistol ammunition, which means their presence on the UK market is virtually nil since the handgun ban, however, they also make a .22 semi-auto rifle which might be of interest to UK shooters, being inexpensive and having a detachable box ten-round magazine.

Many shooters in GB bought Marlin rifles to replace their handguns, Marlin had a new rifle that should be of interest called the 1894P.  This is a .44 Magnum lever-action with a 16-inch ported barrel.  I found it to be very handy during my brief examination, I expect I will be seeing local shooters buying these.

Mauser, now owned by SIG Arms, had never-ending variations of the classic 98 on display, from the standard model which costs around £350, all the way up to the Magnum models, which cost over £4,000.  Mauser also has other models such as the M96 straight-pull, a 98-year younger design that I suspect is still outsold by the 1898.  Mauser has come out with a new pistol design called the M2, from what I have seen of it I don’t like it, though I can’t really comment until I’ve tried one.  Beechwood are the UK importers for Mauser.

I also visited the stand of a company called MEN, short for Metallwerk Elisenhütte Nassau, who you may never have heard of but they are the contractors for the German Army, and make all their ammunition.  I found out the name of the UK agents, but I suspect they are more orientated toward the military end of things.  It certainly looks like quality stuff though, I’d like to try some of their 5.56mm if I could get hold of it.

NORINCO, our copycat Chinese friends were there breathlessly waiting for other people’s patents to expire so that they could copy their products.  SIG appears to be the latest victim, given the NC226 pistol, a copy of the P226.  The Chinese version has a chromed barrel.

Dangerous Dave from the Old Western Scrounger was there, this guy comes across as being a bit nuts, but what can you say about someone still advertising 7.92mm Kurz?  If you can’t find it, call Dave, there’s a good chance he’s got it!

Pardini had a stand, (drool), it’s at times like this I truly resent Tony and his chronies taking our handguns off us, but they do make some air pistols.

And if Pardini is not cool enough, there is always Perazzi, whose display was at risk of serious rust from people drooling all over their shotguns, most of which are in the six-figure range.  Look on the bright side, they’re legal in the British Isles, if you can afford the insurance!

Coming back down to Earth there was PMC, makers of a wide variety of ammunition.  A Korean company that now makes most of it’s ammo in the US, PMC now apparently means “Precision Made Cartridges” although it used to mean something unpronounceable in Korean!  Importers are York Guns.  I have used PMC ammo for years without any problems.

Another ammo company was Pretoria Metal Pressings, better known as PMP.  I have used PMP pistol and rifle ammo, my main complaint is that the primers are a bit hard.  PMP were promoting their line of hunting ammunition.

I spoke to Remington, expect their electronic-ignition ammo and guns in Europe by Autumn, I was told.

Another company making clothing that we don’t see too often in the British Isles is Sauer, interesting stuff, follow the link!

Schmidt & Bender had a stand.  They have a well-earned reputation for quality.  This was my first time having a look at their mil-dot scopes – this is a recticle with dots along the lines every MOA.  I didn’t dislike it, this is one of those things you have to try before you buy, hard to do with stuff this expensive!

Sellier & Bellot were there with their extensive line of ammunition, several things caught my eye: first were their brass .410 shotgun cases for reloading.  These should be of interest to UK shooters as using .410 shotgun slugs seems to be becoming more popular.  S&B also had a 12 gauge slug load designed for target shooting, which is another new choice for practical shotgun.  Finally, they also have their own .357 SIG load, with an unusual 140gr bullet.

I visited the Sierra bullets stand where they were giving away free key rings that lasted about halfway through the first day.  I’m fond of MatchKing bullets as they seem to be able to cope well in military spec barrels, but deliver vastly superior performance to any open base bullet.  Of course, the purists among you would argue for a nice custom barrel and VLDs, but I’m stubborn.

Cripes, at we’re at SIG Arms already.  SIG Arms is up for sale, as apparently SIG prefers making food packaging to making guns, unfortunately I don’t have €20 million to hand.  SIG Arms has bought up several gun companies, and had the biggest stand at the show.  They were heavily promoting their line of SHR 970 hunting rifles, which are available in most popular calibres, and most popular colours too.  Not sure if bright green is really up my alley.  They appear to be a decent if somewhat ho hum hunting rifle.

There is also the inevitable new compact version of the SIG Pro pistol, the SPC2009 etc.  And also new models with slide-mounted safeties, I assume either for stupid cops or to deflect silly American lawsuits.  These models have an “M” suffix.

There were loads of interesting gizmos on their stand, including by far the cleverest cutaway pistol I have ever seen.  I also finally got my hands on a custom shop brochure, I’ve been after one for awhile.

I picked up a brochure for their barrel-making division, and there was an impressive display of barrel corrosion resistance on their stand (sorry, forgot to take a picture).  I suspect you need to order large numbers to make it cost effective, but they’re probably among the best there is.

Sauer is also trying to flog what look like badge-engineered shotguns – give it up guys, stick with the rifles.

Smith & Wesson, probably the stupidest company in the world, going by their recent agreement with the US Govt., had a stand, but everything was locked up in display racks, so everyone went down the aisle to one of their distributor stands.  S&W make guns specifically for the European market, the Super 9 is one of them.  This is a 9mm pistol that has seperate barrels for 9×21 and .356TSW (9×21.5mm)  I have never seen any .356TSW in Europe and I seriously doubt I ever will.  They also make a version of the 686 for the European market, the 686 International DX, essentially the standard 686 with an unfluted cylinder and target wood stocks.  S&W have also started adding attachment rails to their tactical models, it looks very clumsy as a result.

My only comment really is that S&W better start hoping international sales go up sharply, because their US sales look set for the dustbin going by the text of the agreement they signed!

Sommer und Ockenfuss are a company unknown in the UK, although I was told that John Reed of London(?) are their distributors here.  This is a company of some interest, because they make a pump-action rifle that is legal here.  It’s legal because the action is cocked by moving the pistol grip back and forth, rather than the forend.  Not cheap though, around £1,300.  As a bullpup design it has a so-so trigger pull, though it it’s certainly usable.  Calibres are 7.62 NATO and .300 Win. Mag.

Sphinx were displaying their range of pistols.  I’ve owned two Sphinx pistols and they’re very nice, unfortunately the .40s don’t work properly.  All the guns on the stand were 9mm.  Hmm…  the 9mms are among the best in the world though, there is no doubt about that.

Steyr also had a new pistol on display, another predictable compact model, this time of their M-series, called the S-series.  The trigger pulls on these guns are really light, compared to the prototypes that were really heavy.  Oh well, at least from the target shooting standpoint they should be quite good.

They also had on display the SBS 96 HB Tactical model, that was originally called the practical model.  These are really nice, someone please buy one so I can try it out!  Also ten-round magazines appear to be available again for the SSG.

Thompson-Center have a new .22 semi-auto rifle.  It looks quite nice although it’s not that special.  Lots of muzzle-loading rifles if you like that sort of thing!

Vektor make some interesting guns, and I cannot believe how cheap they are!  The CP1 compact pistol costs around £200 in Germany.  The weak Rand being the reason, I suspect.  Of interest to UK shooters are the straight-pull sporter versions of the R4 assault rifle.  These seem quite interesting, though not as inexpensive as the pistols.  If you are an RFD and want to be a distributor, I have their number, email me!

Walther had one of the bigger stands, and one of the larger selections.  Of interest to shooters in the British Isles is the GSP rifle, essentially the GSP pistol with a 16-inch heavy barrel dropped into a thumbhole stock.  Very nice indeed, although I have to say I think it is more likely to appeal to oppressed ISSF pistol shooters here than anyone else.  Some of the controls are a bit difficult to get to on it.

Other products included the PPK/E pistol, an “improved” version of the ancient PPK pistol – basically I think Ulm are looking for a use for their tooling.  I couldn’t see anything special about it.

There are also several “James Bond” commemoratives, which I thought were a bit naff (especially the blank firers) but you pay your money and take your choice, I suppose.

Another gun of interest was the CP99, essentially the same mechanism as the CP88 fit into a plastic body that looks like a P99.  Got to say I think the earlier CP88 is superior.  I quite like the blowback CO2 Walther PPK/S though.

And nearly last, but by no means least, were James Watson’s falling block rifles on the Border Barrels stand, made in Scotland no less.  I’m no expert but they seemed very well made and certainly less expensive than the competition.

And finally, Winchester had their timeless designs on display, not much new except for some more variations on the Model 70.

Until next year… 


“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms.  History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so.” – Adolf Hitler

Tony Blair and the BS Brigade

The most astonishing thing that has occurred in the past six months was Tony Blair’s claim to be a “friend of shooters”, with a firm vow that he will not ban shooting.  Er, bit too late for that isn’t it Tony?

In reality, the reason for our Leader’s comments are the increasingly effective marches organised by the Countryside Alliance.  The PM seems to think that a lot of misguided shooters are joining in with opposing the ban on fox hunting.  Actually, Tony, your urgent need to ban handguns as soon as you took office basically put the nail in that coffin.  No amount of words from you now is going to reassure shooters.

On the bright side however, it would appear that Blair is so worried that he does not want anything to pop up which could confirm the claims of the Countryside Alliance that shooting is up next for the chop after fox hunting.  Noticeable is the appointment of Kate Hoey to be Minister of Sport, someone who is well-known for her tolerant views of fox hunting.

More blatant was the packing off of Chris Mullin MP (Sunderland) into a minor ministerial job after he announced as Chairman of the Home Affairs Committee a review of firearms controls.  In 1996 Mr Mullin made his views quite clear that he wanted virtually everything banned, with the exception of a few tightly controlled airguns and the odd shotgun owned by someone who lived only in a “rural” area.  That he would recommend a virtual ban on everything was obvious, so we now have Robin Corbett MP (Erdington) to contend with instead.  Mr Corbett is known to be independent-minded and made some speeches in 1987 and 1996 in support of shooters.  He is not a pro-gunner per se, but he knows silly laws when he sees them.

We await the report of the Home Affairs Commitee with interest (apparently this will be in May).  You can read the evidence of the Home Office by clicking here.  Note especially paragraph 388 of the oral evidence, and the subsequent comments about how the handgun ban will have little effect on crime.  So why bother with it?

Antis fail to impress

The report of the Firearms Consultative Committee this year made for interesting reading, I won’t bore you with the details as it has been overshadowed by the HAC review.  The main thread running through it though is the utter intellectual bankruptcy of the Gun Control Network, which doesn’t even seem to be able to network that well given their microscopic membership.  In virtually every instance the GCN disagrees with the rest of the committee, thus leaving them wandering out into the void of isolation.

Jersey

Jersey is where the “action” is at the moment.  For those of you from foreign climes or the truly ignorant Brit, Jersey is a little island off the coast of France which is sort of part of Britain, but it’s not, because it has it’s own legislature.  Jersey is well-known as a tax haven and also a tourist destination.

I was fortunate enough to be involved in the formulation of their new law, and was able to direct them away from some serious gaffs.  Unfortunately their Home Affairs Committee insisted on persevering with some of the worst provisions of the Bill, and it looked headed for defeat in the States (their legislature) until at the last moment they pulled the proverbial rabbit out of the hat, in the form of an Attorney General’s opinion that the current law has no provision for visitors who wish to shoot shotguns on the island.  So the Bill passed.  Time will tell whether I was right or not about the bad parts of it.

In fairness, the States got rid of some of the bad parts, like a total ban on expanding ammunition.  The FCC has recommended the repeal of our ban, which has exemptions.  The Jersey Bill would have banned it entirely, but fortunately it was amended out of the Bill.

However, the worst provision, the introduction of firearm certificates for shotgun possession, remains in it.  The problem is that the Police have completely underestimated this task.  The Bill provides for only a one year transitional period, and there are estimated to be on the order of 10-20,000 unlicensed shotguns on the island.  Assuming the average owner owns two, that is 5-10,000 applications to process in one year, in addition to all the additional new requirements involved in the renewal or variation of currently issued certificates for handguns and rifles (based on our own 1997 Act).  By my reckoning, the police will need another three to five staff, but the Bill begins by saying: “The Chief Officer of the Jersey Police has assured the Committee that there will be no manpower or financial implications…”

The main bright spot is that the new law (which will probably be called the Firearms (Jersey) Law 2000) does not ban handguns, and centrefire semi-automatic rifles also remain legal on the Island.

Assassins and rampaging gunmen prove folly of gun laws

Like people the world over, I watched the shootings at Columbine High School with horror – more soul searching is caused each time one of these tragic events happens.  It is not a wonder that there is usually a kneejerk reaction, a call for more gun laws.

That more gun laws would not have stopped the killings in Colorado is of course plain on its face.  To begin with, they weren’t just armed with guns – they had bombs as well, that were homemade.

In addition, they cut a swathe through the statute book, breaking so many existing laws that it is hard to count them all up.  But of course, that doesn’t stop the call for yet more laws.

Britain of course had more gun laws than almost anywhere in the US prior to the shootings in Dunblane, but that did not stop them from happening.  More laws will not stop it from happening again.  But enough about schools.

Madmen and assassins

Two days after the shootings at Columbine High School, criminals on the run in Rochdale, Manchester opened fire with an AK-47, wounding six, and garnering themselves 20 counts of attempted murder.  This is despite a ban on machineguns in this country since 1936.

On the weekend it happened again, a man walked into a pub in Manchester and opened fire, injuring three.

And then on the Monday, BBC TV presenter Jill Dando was shot dead on her doorstep with a handgun.

Those of us who were hoping that was it were disappointed when a man went on a rampage in Feltham, London a few days later, armed with an AK-47 and a pistol, spraying police cars with automatic weapons fire and eventually escaping to a housing estate where he broke into a house and took three people hostage.

And it goes on.

Of course, the Government denies that this shows that the handgun ban was an abject failure, because they point out to us that it was only intended to prevent the misuse of legally possessed handguns.  But that was not the way it was portrayed at the time, and thanks to modern technology that can be easily proven by clicking here.  Clearly there are a lot of handguns still “on the streets of Britain”.

Bear in mind that on average before the ban, there were two murders a year with legally possessed handguns, and that includes service weapons issued to the police and the armed forces.

If past performance is anything to go by, the Government will only admit that the handgun ban is a failure after another nutcase goes berserk with a legally possessed gun and shoots dead a large number of people.  Then they will tell us that the handgun ban didn’t go far enough, and they didn’t ban rifles and shotguns as well because of the strength of the “gun lobby” and because they wanted to “play fair”.

It’s a never ending spiral of lies on lies, with the Government flogging a horse that is not only dead but long since decomposed.  We have already seen Home Office minister Paul Boateng attempting to explain away incidents like those in Rochdale on lax controls in other countries, like the Japanese have.  The difference is that the Government doesn’t seem able to explain why our armed crime rate is not significantly different from many of our European neighbours with much less restrictive laws.  For most of the past ten years, our armed robbery rate has paralleled that in Switzerland (which has the least restrictive gun laws in Europe), with the main difference being that ours was rising, whereas their rate was stable.  Finally, the Met realised that armed robbery could only be tackled by enforcing the law rather than simply writing endless volumes of it.

It is worth noting that the major city with the lowest armed crime rate in Europe is Brugges, in Belgium.  Belgium of course has the least restrictive gun laws in the EU.

So what is the solution?  Well, the solution to armed crime is not going to be more laws, it’s going to have to be a pro-active approach to tackling it, and we have prepared a position paper outlining two ways to do it.

But gun owners in Great Britain must never stop protesting loudly at their scapegoating, because it was wrong, and predictably, it didn’t work.


“Let us remember that ‘if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.’  It is a very serious consideration… that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event.” – Samuel Adams, 1771. 

SHOT show 1999

February 1-4 saw the SHOT show take place at the Georgia World Congress Center in Atlanta. Your intrepid Editor took the trip across the pond and this is the news he came back with:

Perazzis.jpg (239558 bytes)

A-Zoom ammo: I mention them only because they had some neat snap caps, made from aluminium with a plastic primer. They are much better than the stupid red plastic things.

Armalite: The gun of interest here was the new AR-50 in .50 BMG, a single shot bolt-action. It appeared to be a competent piece of kit. And it’s Section 1! Southern Gun Company are the Armalite distributors in the UK.

Advanced Interactive Systems: This company makes an interactive video system which is similar to a video game, projected onto a screen which can be used with airguns, airmunition guns, lasers etc. There are various programs available, for IPSC, police training and so on, and also there are some adapted video games, though you’ll need LOTS of ammo for the games. The cheapest system is $20,000, but it’s an option for clubs. You can also use real guns using a shoot-through screen. It’s a lot of fun, I was very impressed with it.

Airmunition: This company makes compressed air cartridges which together with a conversion barrel convert a pistol or revolver into an airgun. The cartridges telescope, and when the firing pin hits the valve, they expand, forcing the pellet on one end down the barrel and on the other end forcing the slide open. Very neat gizmo, used already in the Webley Valtro AP92 pistol. Of serious interest is the new Glock 17T which uses these cartridges. Muzzle energy is about 1.5 – 2 ft lbf, effective range about 11 metres.

Aimpoint: Aimpoint sights keep getting smaller, the US Army now uses the model M which is essentially a shorter version of the Aimpoint 5000. www.aimpointusa.com and www.aimpoint.se

Beamhit: These are so neat that I bought one and brought it back with me. Essentially a laser reactive target and a laser device you mount in the barrel of the gun. You can use it with most rifles and shotguns, and also with your deactivated pistols if you have one with a plugged chamber rather than a rod down the barrel. Basic system comes with a laser and one target, and costs $299. The laser runs off 4 lithium batteries and the target off a 9V transformer or 4 AA batteries. You

can do basic target practice and there is also a par time function. It works up to quite a distance away, I’ve used it at 10 metres furthest so far. The newer lasers fit almost completely inside the barrel, but the older ones are better if you intend on using a deact as most of it hangs out the end of the barrel thus the rod is shorter. It’s mostly plastic so it doesn’t harm the balance of the gun. Only problem I’ve found is that it’s quite difficult to zero, and you have to zero it again when you reattach it. The zeroing adjustments are just a tad too crude, though I got it done eventually.

There are various higher priced models, with turning targets and so on. The club version costs $1,799 and hooks up to a PC serial port and tells you exactly where on the target you hit, your speed, and so on, and it can be set up for more complex functions.

This system turns dry-firing from boredom into a serious challenge, especially with the timing function, and I strongly recommend it.

Barrett: The new product this year was the Barrett 99, which is a single-shot bolt-action .50BMG with an SRP of $2,800. This puts it within the reach of most shooter’s pockets, and sales appear to be brisk. Definitely the best of the cheaper .50 rifles, IMO. Don’t know who imports them, but they are Section 1.

Beretta: New products were essentially repackaged old products. The only real thing of interest was the ES100 semi-auto shotguns, which are budget semi-autos for field use. All of the new pistols were things that were essentially relaunched, such as the 92FS Type M and the Brigadier. I tried a Brigadier out in 1994, I have no idea why it’s taken this long to get them generally distributed.

More interesting were the Stock and the Combat pistols, with cocked and locked safeties and the Combat models have SA-only pulls. The Combat guns would make good entry level IPSC guns, IMO.

Also the 96 is now available in stainless, though there were only pictures of it on the stand.

Benelli: The new product here was the Nova pump-action shotgun. It’s a competent pump, but I can’t understand why anyone would want one over a Super 90 semi-auto.

Briley: Some neat stuff, especially their custom 10/22s and shotgun chokes. Hopefully there is someone out there with the sense to bring in their chokes at least.

Colt: They had no real new products, the only one being the Pocket Nine which is essentially the Colt Pony in 9mm. The thing that caught my eye was the Buntline Special, which can be custom ordered with an 18″ barrel which would make it legal in GB. But prices would be steep.

Colt also had an AIS system set up using the same lasers as the Beamhit called the Colt HomeFire system. This is really the best of both worlds, and costs only $800. But you really need a large screen TV to get the most out of it. Available in July, they told me.

Civil Defence Supply Group: These are the people making the .224 BOZ featured in G&A. Essentially a 10mm Auto necked down to .22 using a variety of different .223 bullets. Chambered in modified MP5/10s and SVI pistols. The MP5 version I think is a waste of time, why not just get an H&K 53? The pistol is more interesting. The idea behind this is that you get ballistics approaching a .223 Remington (a long way short though) for the purpose of piercing body armour.

A bit of a niche market, though, they’re only selling it to Govt. entities so I don’t think they’ll get far with it, I’m afraid to say.

Dillon: New gizmo is the SL900 shotshell progressive reloader. Not only the best but the only such loader in it’s class. Frankly you’re mad to buy any other reloading equipment other than Dillon if you’re into quantity reloading. There’s a reason Mike Dillon has the money to buy a helicopter and put two miniguns on it.

DPMS: Getting a reputation now for seriously accurate AR-15s, Jerry Miculek waxes on about them in the back of their brochure. The sidecocking version is very neat, but could use more spring tension on the cocking bar, plus a cut-out for the cocking handle to fold down into would be nice. That version is Section 1 and is sold in the UK by Southern Gun Co.

Dynamit Nobel: I think the new CP96 is actually sold under a different name in the UK, basically a poor man’s Steyr LP5. Very neat, with a 5-shot mag, designed for UIT rapid fire, but also a good plinker for those who want something of higher quality than the Umarex CO2 guns. 425fps, pretty respectable.

Eley: Launching the Match Xtra Plus, the poor man’s Tenex. Can’t really

comment more without actually using it, also Tenex is now higher spec. Presumably whatever they’re using on the MXP they’re using on the Tenex. And it’s made in Birmingham!

Federal: Interesting stuff from these guys, even now they’re owned by Blount. A large increase in loads using the Trophy Bonded Bear Claw, which should be looked at seriously by most people using rifles for field purposes in the UK, going by the specs of it. Of more interest is an increase in the loadings for Tungsten-Iron shotshells, which is claimed to be the best ammo there is bar none for use on birds. More energy downrange than lead, the speed of steel, safe in shotguns designed for steel, cheaper than Bismuth, etc. On to a winner here, methinks. Also developments in sabot slugs, which should be looked at seriously by anyone contemplating the use of a rifled shotgun, such as the Mossberg or Marlin bolt guns which are Section 1.

FN/Browning: Two new products, one of them quite big though hardly anyone noticed it. First is a straight-pull hunting rifle, which has no name yet and is still in pre-production. Basically a capitalisation on the Mauser 96 and the Blaser’s popularity with a name you know stamped on it.

Of more interest though equally unimaginative is the FN Forty-Nine pistol.

Sometimes being boring pays off, this is the first plastic-framed pistol I have come across which looks capable of beating Glock at their own game.

The top half is pure Glock, but made from stainless steel. The mechanism differs only in that the trigger cocks the striker completely when you pull it, rather than the prepped method the Glock uses. This means you can pull the trigger twice or more on a round which hasn’t gone off.

The bottom half of the gun features a very nicely shaped grip which feels better than that of the Glock in my hands, with a nice big round mag button.

The trigger pull is quite long, but not as long as a revolver, but it was clean though a bit mushy, but letoff was just in the right place. There are no external safeties at all.

This is a serious contender in the police pistol market. In many ways it is better than the Glock though the Glock still has the edge for target shooters.

Wholesale price is only $330, available in .40 and 9mm, mag capacities 14 and 16 respectively.

Glock: I didn’t make too many friends on the Glock stand, I think they have become more than a little complacent with the success of the company.

The new product is the Glock 36, essentially a Glock 30 with a single stack six-shot magazine, thereby giving the 36 the welcome feature of a grip you can get your hand around.

Another new product which is of major interest to British shooters is the Glock 17T in 7.8x21mm AC, which uses the airmunition cartridges. Apart from the barrel, recoil spring and locking insert, it is identical to a Glock 17 but should be legal in GB. Won’t be cheap though, as you need the press to compress the cartridges and also a tank of compressed air in addition to the gun and the pellets.

Glock’s other big thing was a new dealer’s kit with signs, leisure wear etc., which is all well and good but they couldn’t tell me when their website would be finished. The other thing I had a go at them about was this stupid habit they have of not stamping the full calibre names on their guns, because of misplaced pride and “Not Invented Here” syndrome. First it was the Glock 22 and 23 stamped “.40” instead of “.40S&W” (though later some guns were stamped “.40SW” but not anymore), then the 21 stamped “.45 Auto” instead of “.45 ACP”, and now, worst of all, the Glocks 31-33 stamped “.357” instead of “.357SIG”. There are quite a few handgun cartridges named .357, this is an accident waiting to happen and far too serious a matter to be left to dim-witted people in the marketing dept.

Another gripe was the new grip design, which I don’t like. This is based on the 26 and 27, i.e. finger-groove grips and thumbrests. Also there is an accessory rail now on the front of the frame. Great if your hand fits the grooves, not so great if you have thin fingers like mine. Oh well, there’s always a Dremmel tool.

H&K OICW.jpg (57509 bytes)

Heckler & Koch: Oooh, I’m not an H&K nut, but there was some neat toys on their stand! They had an H&K OICW in a display case, and also one of the prototype .45 P7s.

One of the talking points of the show were their new rifles, it was tough to get near them for the first two days of the show. The SL-8 is based on the G36 assault rifle, which is rapidly becoming known as the most reliable and durable 5.56mm assault rifle ever made. The SL-8 is a sporter version, with a thumbhole stock, other military features removed, and in place of the combo scope and red dot of the G36 are iron sights and a two foot picatinny rail which should mount just about anything you could possibly want optics wise. There are two versions of the SL-8, one for the European market and one for the US market. They differ in their colour, the US gun has a black stock and US flag on the butt, whereas the European version has a tan “hunting” stock, and also they differ in the design of the magazine well. The European version uses the same mag. well as the G36, but the US version uses a narrower mag. well which takes a single-stack .223 10-shot mag, neatly side-stepping the ban on the import of semi-auto rifles which take “large capacity military magazines”.

The SL-8 on the stand had a reasonable trigger pull, clean, a bit of creep to begin with, but no worse than the average AR-15 really. H&K expects to import 2,000 of them, SRP will probably be $1,495.

Obviously it’s illegal in the UK, but now that H&K have a gas piston operated gun on the market, they could always make it as a straight-pull for the UK market. Oh yes. The cocking handle is ambidextrous, imagine the same cocking method as an Uzi but with a handle which folds either way attached to it.

The other long gun is a .45ACP carbine based on the new UMP .45 SMG. Both struck me as a step backwards. The UMP is essentially a fairly ordinary closed bolt SMG using a plastic receiver chambered in .45. The operating controls are in the same place as the MP5, but the bolt is simply a big chunk of metal, as with SMGs of old. The H&K rep told me the reasoning behind it was that they had had a lot of requests for a .45 SMG as many SWAT teams were going to .45 pistols. I haven’t seen much evidence of that myself, I have to say.

However, the bigger news is that the UMP will also be made in 9mm at some point in the future, and as it is only two-thirds of the price of the MP5, no doubt a lot of police here in the UK will be carrying UMPs in the future.

The semi-auto version is basically only for die-hard H&K fans. It has a

Dragunov style shoulder stock, 16″ barrel single stack .45 mag, etc. Costs four times as much as a Marlin Camp Carbine which does exactly the same thing!

Anyway, sharpen your pencils and let’s see if we can get H&K to make some straight-pull G36s.

Kimber: Known for their superb 1911s, but their new product was a bolt-action .22 based on a modified Mauser action which was simply the best bolt-action .22 I’ve ever laid hands on. Superb quality even on the least expensive model, wonderful trigger pull, had it all. The cheapest model has an SRP of $915, but it’s more of a field gun than the quasi-target guns fitted with a standard stock.

Knight’s Manufacturing Company: Makers of top-end military rifles, like the SR-25, and also the SR-15 in 5.56mm, loads of AR-15 gizmos like the Rail Interface System, I wish someone would order some of these in straight-pull format (they said they’d make them that way if someone ordered them). Really, really nice guns. Also had a new .50, the SR-50, but it’s semi-auto, sigh.

Robinson Armament Co.: A new company making a rifle called the M96 Expeditionary Rifle. Basically an updated Stoner 63, the gun made famous by the USN SEALs in Vietnam. Most of the flaws of the Stoner have been eliminated. Their marketing guy said it could be easily made as a straight-pull, so here is another opportunity for you RFDs out there. Cocking handle is on the left side of the gun as well, just in the right place.

Actually, I forgot to mention DS Arms, who make FALs. They also said they could make a straight-pull FAL without difficulty, however I am a bit queasy about these as many of the small parts they use are Austrian military surplus, so they might be considered Section 5.

Mossberg: Two new gizmos from Mossberg (well, not that new) the 9200 semi-auto, which is a tough, bit crude, but reliable semi-auto 12G in a wide variety of models, and also the odd but original 500 series with a DA trigger pull! Felt really odd to dry fire, I doubt they’ll take off.

Marlin: These guys had various new calibres in old designs, however the guns of interest were the 7000T, a target version of the 7000 semi-auto, the 512P, a new version of the 512 bolt-action shotgun with various improvements and the odd but original 25MG, a bolt-action smoothbore garden gun chambered for .22 magnum! The 7000T goes for twice the standard 7000. A possible alternative to the ubiquitous 10/22.

McMillan Stocks: No really new products, but I was quite taken with their Sportsman’s Team Challenge 10/22 stock, which looks like the stock to get for steel matches. Though you really need one of the really high scope mounts that the top competitors use to go with it.

Michael’s of Oregon: All the fiddily bits we have come to know and love, I won’t bore you with the holsters for which we no longer have any guns for, but their Butler Creek line now features a Carbon Fibre 10/22 barrel, which is called the featherweight. Another extremely useful gizmo for the avid steel plate shooter. Also a new 10/22 target stock which looked like they might sell a few in the UK. Price on the barrel is $150, the stock is $100.

Nosler: Lot’s of neat and deadly bullets, their new product was a sabot bullet designed for muzzleloaders, for those of you who really want to get back to nature!

Otis: makers of cleaning kit, pretty good stuff this, better than your run-of-the-mill Outers kit. Distributed in the UK by Southern Gun Co.

Para-Ordnance: The new gizmo is the new DA 1911, it’s not your average DA, very smooth and light, I almost liked it! Problem is that it’s a one shot deal, you can’t go back and pull the trigger again if the gun doesn’t go off. And the gun is harder to cock with the hammer down.

PMC: now offer .357SIG ammo.

Power Custom: interesting company from Missouri, offering a wide variety of replacement 10/22 parts made from Titanium, such as firing pins, bolt handles, triggers, mag. releases and so on.

Professional Ordnance Inc. – Plastic AR-15s, what will they think of next! Lot of fun these, the rifle model with the fluted barrel was extremely light, essentially only the bolt assembly and the barrel are made of metal, the rest is plastic. Weight is only 3.9lb, while your average similarly equipped AR-15 would be twice that. They told me they could make it as a straight pull, if anyone cares to order enough of them to make it worthwhile.

Remington – Bringing more pain to your shoulder, the 870 will now chamber 3.5″ shells, and the 700 is now chambered for .300 Remington Ultra Mag, when you really must have a .30 which shoots so flat that it makes you flinch with every shot, thereby sending it in a direct straight unaltered line into the ground six feet in front of you. Kidding aside, it looks like a nifty product, should be good for the longer shots. It’s touted as the first commercially available non-belted magnum.

Also a new left-hand model of the 11-87 was introduced. They told me the electronic ignition 700 is two years away.

Ruger (or Sturm, Ruger & Co, for you purists): New item which I have to say bored me to tears is the 50th anniversary Ruger .22 pistol, which differs from the standard .22 in that it has an anniversary emblem on it, red medallions on the stocks, and comes in a red box. Wow.

Also, the Super Redhawk is now available in .454 Casull, for those of you who believe it’s safe in a DA revolver (I remain unconvinced), though as Ted Rowe pointed out to me, few if any people will put more than six rounds through one.

Of more interest is the Ruger 10/22 Magnum. Now that I’ve played with one, I’m not so keen on them as I was. The bolt is incredibly heavy, uses “ultra dense” metal, whatever that is. Balance of the gun is awful, it’s all to the rear. However, the rep told me a target version along the lines of the 10/22T is on the way next year. This will be better as the bull barrel will help balance it out. And no, you can’t use most 10/22 accessories with the magnum version, though you can use aftermarket trigger bits and mag releases, and some barrels – but not stocks, so make sure the barrel fits the standard stock first!

Also there was the new Ruger P97, a plastic framed P90 .45. Doesn’t even make a good paperweight.

The 77/44 is also now available in stainless steel.

Savage Arms: The item of most interest was the Savage Striker pistol, based on the action of the 110 bolt-action rifle. This is the best of the bolt-action pistols IMO as it has the cocking handle on the left side in the correct place. It also holds 3+1, which I think is the largest capacity of them. It would be legal in GB with a slightly longer barrel.

Also of interest is the 110 Scout model, for those who cannot afford a Steyr.

Their .22 rifles also caught my eye, didn’t realise they actually made any until now. The model 64 is a very reasonably priced semi-auto (SRP on nearly all of them is less than $150) – not exactly a target gun but for blasting bunnies at close ranges it would be great, and it has a ten-shot mag. I don’t think budget starter guns like this have much of a market in the UK, but for those of you who run miniature rifle ranges with guns that get knocked around it’s worth a look.

SIGARMS.jpg (77231 bytes)

SIG arms – Although they’ve been in the rifle business for ages, they’ve only recently begun to hit the US market in large numbers as SIG have now repositioned themselves as an all-around gun company, rather than just a handgun company. Loads and loads of neat toys on their stand, which was by far the best looking stand at the show.

First up is the SHR 970 series of hunting rifles, which is Sauer’s budget line. All solidly built and up to the job, but not that exciting. Available in all common calibres, .25-06 through .300 Win Mag. SRPs in the $500 range.

Then there are the well-known Sauer 202s at twice the price, and then going up to the ridiculous price levels are the Blasers. SIG arms bought out Blaser a year or two ago. These Blaser R93s are really nice rifles, and I’m not a hunter, but I want one! They use a straight-pull action which is very swift and comfortable to use. The quality is superb. Available in pretty much all popular hunting calibres. One of the reps from Ray Wards was on the stand trying them out, and we both agreed these are among the nicest hunting rifles we’ve ever laid hands on. Prices start at $1,495 for the synthetic stocked rifles. There is also a tactical model, which actually I think is better than SIG’s own SSG3000, so that will probably be a thing of the past soon. Might be a choice for practical rifle, though it’s a bit cumbersome for a gun on the run. SRP is $2,130.

Something SIG is also going to make but which was not on the stand is a pump-action SG550, to avoid Bill Clinton’s mood swings on the import of semi-auto rifles. But it’s still not legal here, dammit!

Turning to pistols, there is the new Hammerli Trailside pistol which looked as though it was based on the 208. Essentially Hammerli’s answer to the Ruger. Outrageously better though, as you might expect. The trigger pull was target gun quality, not something I would tote in the field. I expect in reality this will be seen as an entry-level gun for UIT and suchlike. No prices, but I got the impression you would be looking at about $1,000.

Turning to target pistols, there is the fairly new SP20, which is simply

an improved 280 available in various natty colours. Also tried the 480

air pistol, once again, very nice. Lovely trigger pull.

On the centrefire front, the quietest product launch of the show was probably the SigPro SP2009, a 9mm version of their plastic framed gun. All the guns on the stand had 15-round cop magazines, so whether it will be available on the civilian market is open to question, though it will be according to the price list. SRP is $596. Overall I don’t like the SigPros very much, the trigger pulls are awful, though I’m keener on the grip design since I tried the rubber grip which comes with the gun as a free accessory.

More interesting was the P245, a cutdown P220 with a 6+1 capacity about the size of a P225. Nice gun. Costs $750.

Also there was the P220 Sport, a P220 with a stainless frame and slide, Hogue grips, LPA sights, polished trigger pull and a whopping great compensator. This goes for $1,320. I personally thought it would be more interesting if they ditched the compensator, as it’s not really competitive in IPSC Open class anyway.

Basically I spent a lot of time on the SIG stand! www.sigarms.ch www.sigarms.com www.hammerli.com www.hammerli.ch etc. Importers are Beechwood Equipment.

Shepherd Scopes – basically the best scopes made, in my opinion. They are calibrated for particular types of ammunition, and have a recticle which allows you to aim off for Known Distance shooting. Also a rather clever method of zeroing. Takes too long to explain, go to their website!

Smith & Wesson – Ooh, I really like that 945, I really do – essentially the front end of a 4506 mated with the back end of a 1911. Felt great in the hand, better than a 1911 as the grip shape is slightly different. Costs around $1,500 which isn’t bad compared to other custom 1911s. Yummy!

Okay, back to reality – the AirLite Titanium revolvers were another talking point of the show, my feeling is that if you have a Section 3 exemption these would be ideal as a humane destruction tool, especially the .38 Special version.

Only weighs 18.9 oz unloaded, and it’s essentially corrosion proof, so it could easily be stuffed in a jacket pocket while out deer stalking. The 242 holds seven rounds. There are various other models, including one with a spur hammer whereas the 242 is DAO. Other calibres available or on their way soon as well. The cylinder is made from titanium, as is the barrel sleeve, the rest is aluminium alloy.

Of perhaps more interest were their CO2 revolvers, made by Umarex, which hold ten .177 pellets. I quite liked these, the Umarex system seems to work better in a revolver than a revolver shaped like a semi-auto. Uses a cylinder magazine, so you’re two shots better off than with a CP88.

Steyr-Mannlicher – okay, you’ve waited long enough – one of the most interesting products at the show for the GB shooter had to be the new range of SBS Tactical rifles. SRP is only $950. Superb trigger pulls, slick action, and unlike the SSG ten-round mags are readily available. In 7.62 only, I predict these will become REALLY popular for practical rifle, in fact probably every event requiring a repeating centrefire rifle. The top end model costs $1,575 and has a 26″ barrel and McMillan stock.

The Scout is also available in a tactical model, which essentially means it’s black and costs another $100.

I find it intriguing that the Scout lists at $1,895 for the basic rifle and

$2,595 with a Leupold scope attached and a carry case. No brainer there!

The Scout is also available now in .376 Steyr as well as 7.62 NATO. I know absolutely nothing about the .376 Steyr and doubt I ever will.

The new pistol is the Steyr M-series, the M9 and the M40. I doubt they’ll sell many to police which is obviously the intended market. The problem is that the trigger travel is too short compared to the Glock. Great for target shooting, but destined to be “unsafe” for cops. The gun is festooned with safety devices though. It has a Garand style safety, a Glock style safety, and if that is not enough, you can lock it with a key.

The sights were interesting as well, a triangular front sight! Problem with that was that the top edge of the sight wears quickly and you get a shiny surface. A bit too novel for the staid gun buying public. This was confirmed when Wayne Novak appeared next to me, picked one up and muttered: “Which [beep] idiot designed these [beep] sights?”

Big news for us poor individuals as regards pistols is a 1911 style grip

which can be mounted on the LP5 repeating air pistol. Very neat. Might buy one, but all up it’ll set you back a thousand quid or so. Importers

are Sportsmans Gun Centre. www.gsifirearms.com

Swarovski – lots of very neat scopes and binoculars. I had a play with

their laser-range finding scope. Definitely one of the better gizmos.

SRP on it is $4,994. Cough.

Nearly forgot Springfield Armory – nothing spectacularly new to report,

though it was fun hanging out with Rob Leatham!

Taurus – the big new product is their Titanium revolvers. They have one like the S&W with a titanium cylinder and barrel sleeve, but also revolvers with all major parts made from titanium. A bit of overkill, and I was wondering about galling, but they certainly looked neat, available in a variety of flashy colours.

Also they had the “Raging Hornet” which is a .22 Hornet revolver built on the same frame as the Raging Bull .454 Casull, with an 8″ barrel. It weighs a ton, and I could not see any earthly reason for it.

Thompson/Center Arms – there was nothing earth shatteringly new for 1999, though there are a substantial number of new permutations of muzzle-loaders. They also told me a UK company had bought a bunch of Contenders with long barrels, however, there’s no reason why you couldn’t buy an Encore with a shoulder stock and 12″ pistol barrel, or conversely an Encore with a pistol grip and 26″ rifle barrel and be legal (in GB).

Tikka – lots of interesting rifles on the Stoeger stand, the US importer, though I don’t think any of them were new per se. Solid rifles though, JLS arms is the UK importer.

Tijicon – newer smaller versions of the ACOG keep coming out, for those of you who haven’t used one, these are similar to red dot sights but instead of a dot there is a tiny triangle which is illuminated by Tritium. I might get one of the smaller models, but they aren’t cheap. But I suppose you save on batteries! Available in various magnifications as well.

The newer reflex sight is good too, this is a basic dot sight with no magnification but using tritium. Both sights are popular with the US armed forces. The reflex sights start at $300 and go up to about $500 depending on what you’re mounting it on, essentially. The compact ACOGs start at $600 and the full size ones at $900.

I’ve used their pistol night sights for years and never had any problem.

Tasco – the only thing I really noticed was the Firepoint sight, which is made in the UK, and is best described as a miniature C-More. It was being hawked on the Tasco stand by of all people Gerry White! It is sold in the US as the Tasco Optima 2000. I’ve finally got some contact details so I might be able to buy one now!

Vektor – The US State Dept. doesn’t like LIW, who make Vektor firearms, because they sold some automatic cannons to the wrong people a few years back but apparently they have now relented and the guns are being imported into the US.

The Vektor CP1 was one of the main talking points of the show, due to the pent up demand created by various articles in US gun magazines over the last few years. It appears to have been improved as the trigger pull was much better on the one I tried than the ones I’ve tried before. Nifty gun, racy looking and largely based on the H&K P7. I was also very impressed by the Z88, the South African service pistol. This is a direct copy of the Beretta 92F but it appeared to be tighter and of higher quality. Better trigger pull certainly.

Walther – and finally, Walther. Big news of the show is that Smith & Wesson will be making the P99 under license as a replacement for the awful Sigma. Walther also had a S&W revolver customised for hunting on their stand, called the R99 – based on a 3″ barrelled L-frame.

Of possible interest was the P99 La Chasse, which is a version of the P99 designed for hunters. However, the upmarket models of it may be legal in GB under a Section 7(3) exemption due to the engraving on the gun – SRP is over $2,000, about three times that of a standard P99.

The trigger has been redesigned on the P99 and is now more curved and feels much better than it did.

The other new product which will be really popular in GB and also Ireland is the GSP rifle. This is essentially a GSP pistol frame fitted with a long bull barrel and set into a thumbhole stock. For those of you who miss UIT .22, there is no reason you could not fit it with a pistol grip, though you’ll need some kind of stand to rest the barrel on! Ten-round magazines are also available for the GSP now. UK importers are Accuracy International – SRP on the iron sighted model is £1,250, though I recommend you get the model designed for optics.